Download Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on by Robert C. Pinto (auth.) PDF

By Robert C. Pinto (auth.)

ISBN-10: 9048157137

ISBN-13: 9789048157136

Chapters 1-12 of this quantity comprise the papers on infonnal common sense and argumentation that i have released and/or learn at meetings during the last 17 years. those papers are reproduced the following pretty well unchanged from their first visual appeal; it's my purpose that their visual appeal the following represent a checklist of my positions and arguments on the time in their unique booklet or supply. i have made minor alterations in fonnat, within the variety of references, etc., for the sake of consistency; i have additionally corrected typographical mistakes etc. the one huge adjustments in wording take place within the previous couple of pages of bankruptcy 7, and have been made basically to let the reader to determine extra truly what i used to be getting at in my first try to write in regards to the thought of coherence. bankruptcy thirteen was once written expressly for this quantity. It seems to be retrospectively on the contents of the 1st 12 chapters and makes an attempt to spotlight the unifying issues that run via them. It additionally revisits the tips approximately dialectic that occupied my first in mild of later advancements in my considering but in addition re­ paper, remodeling them emphasizing subject matters approximately which i have tended to stay silent within the previous few years.

Show description

Read or Download Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic with an Introduction by Hans V. Hansen PDF

Similar epistemology books

Facts and the Function of Truth (Philosophy of Theory)

This ebook examines the excellence among fact-stating and non-fact-stating makes use of of language. This contrast is necessary in lots of parts of recent philosophy and is important to "non-factualism"; the view that regardless of appearances, sure parts of discourse aren't genuine. those functions often think that the inspiration of assertion of truth will be analysed in a single of 3 methods: semantically, metapysically and psychologically.

Pathways to Knowledge: Private and Public

How do we recognize? How do we reach justified trust? those conventional questions in epistemology have encouraged philosophers for hundreds of years. Now, during this unparalleled paintings, Alvin Goldman, distinctive student and chief within the fields of epistemology and brain, methods such inquiries as valid equipment or "pathways" to wisdom.

The Philosophy of J. L. Austin

Those new essays on J. L. Austin's philosophy represent the 1st significant examine of his inspiration in many years. 8 top philosophers subscribe to jointly to provide a clean review of his targeted paintings, displaying the way it will be dropped at endure on matters on the best of brand new philosophical schedule, akin to scepticism and contextualism, the epistemology of testimony, the generality of the conceptual, and the viability of the semantics/pragmatics contrast.

Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation

The suggestion of burden of facts and its significant other inspiration of presumption are critical to argumentation stories. This ebook argues that we will be able to research much from how the courts have built strategies through the years for allocating and reasoning with presumptions and burdens of evidence, and from how synthetic intelligence has equipped unique formal and computational platforms to symbolize this sort of reasoning.

Extra resources for Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic with an Introduction by Hans V. Hansen

Sample text

If such an interpretation is sustainable, the strength of the support which premisses provide for conclusions they entail is therefore relative to persons at times, and moreover cannot be assessed in abstraction from consideration of what makes the premisses acceptable. 15 See Alvin Goldman's use of a similar argument in Goldman 1986, pp. 83-84. The context is one in which Goldman is arguing that formal logic does not supply principles of good reasoning and that there is a need for an "informal logic" which would be a "branch of epistemology" (p.

Much of moral argumentation aims at engendering approval (or disapproval) of the performance of certain actions. Much argumentation concerned with practical and prudential matters aims at engendering the intention to perform (or to refrain from performing) certain actions. Consequently, the attempt to modify a person's doxastic attitudes through rational means is but a special case of attempting to modify propositional attitudes through rational means. It is evident that we do try to affect intentions, fears, hopes, desires through rational persuasion and therefore through argument.

CHAPTER 4 THE RELATION OF ARGUMENT TO INFERENCE I'm going to use the word inference for the mental act or event in which a person draws a conclusion from premisses, or arrives at a conclusion on the basis of the consideration of a body of evidence. I'm going to use the word argument for a set of statements or propositions that one person offers to another in the attempt to induce that other person to accept some conclusion.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.15 of 5 – based on 44 votes