Download Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications by John MacFarlane PDF

By John MacFarlane

ISBN-10: 0199682755

ISBN-13: 9780199682751

John MacFarlane debates how we would make experience of the concept fact is relative, and the way we would use this concept to provide fulfilling money owed of components of our inspiration and speak that experience resisted conventional tools of research. even if there's a great philosophical literature on relativism approximately fact, going again to Plato's Theaetetus, this literature (both seasoned and con) has tended to target refutations of the doctrine, or refutations of those refutations, on the rate of claiming truly what the doctrine is. by contrast, Assessment Sensitivity starts with a transparent account of what it truly is to be a relativist approximately fact, and makes use of this view to offer pleasurable bills of what we suggest once we speak about what's tasty, what we all know, what's going to occur, what will be the case, and what we should do. The booklet seeks to supply a richer framework for the outline of linguistic practices than normal truth-conditional semantics offers: person who permits not only usual contextual sensitivity (sensitivity to gains of the context within which an expression is used), yet assessment sensitivity (sensitivity to beneficial properties of the context from which a use of an expression is assessed).

The Context and Content sequence is a discussion board for extraordinary unique learn on the intersection of philosophy, linguistics, and cognitive technology. the overall editor is Francois Recanati (Institut Jean-Nicod, Paris).

Show description

Read or Download Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications PDF

Best epistemology books

Facts and the Function of Truth (Philosophy of Theory)

This booklet examines the excellence among fact-stating and non-fact-stating makes use of of language. This contrast is necessary in lots of components of recent philosophy and is imperative to "non-factualism"; the view that regardless of appearances, yes parts of discourse are usually not actual. those functions usually think that the idea of assertion of truth should be analysed in a single of 3 methods: semantically, metapysically and psychologically.

Pathways to Knowledge: Private and Public

How will we comprehend? How will we reach justified trust? those conventional questions in epistemology have encouraged philosophers for hundreds of years. Now, during this extraordinary paintings, Alvin Goldman, unusual pupil and chief within the fields of epistemology and brain, ways such inquiries as valid equipment or "pathways" to wisdom.

The Philosophy of J. L. Austin

Those new essays on J. L. Austin's philosophy represent the 1st significant research of his proposal in many years. 8 best philosophers subscribe to jointly to give a clean overview of his detailed paintings, exhibiting the way it could be dropped at endure on matters on the best of present day philosophical time table, comparable to scepticism and contextualism, the epistemology of testimony, the generality of the conceptual, and the viability of the semantics/pragmatics contrast.

Burden of Proof, Presumption and Argumentation

The inspiration of burden of evidence and its better half idea of presumption are crucial to argumentation experiences. This booklet argues that we will be able to examine much from how the courts have built systems through the years for allocating and reasoning with presumptions and burdens of facts, and from how synthetic intelligence has equipped exact formal and computational structures to symbolize this sort of reasoning.

Additional resources for Assessment Sensitivity: Relative Truth and its Applications

Example text

They then attempt to show that these theories, when properly understood, lead to the idea that truth is a relative property. The point is perhaps easiest to see with a pragmatic theory of truth. 10 James seems to accept this thesis: “in any concrete account of what is denoted by ‘truth’ in human life, the word can only be used relatively to some particular trower” (James 1978: 313). Epistemic theories of truth, which call true what a community of idealized enquirers would be justified in believing, also give a clear sense to the idea that truth might be relative.

But if (5) is to do the work that (4) would do, we must be able to move from (5) and (6) Billy asserted that snow is white (7) Snow is white. to And what we need for that is precisely an instance of the Equivalence Schema: (8) The proposition that snow is white is true iff snow is white. So the Equivalence Schema underlies the essential expressive function of the truth predicate. Although some relativists about truth have conceded that their view is incompatible with the equivalence schema (Nozick 2001: 41), it is open to a relativist to promote the theoretical utility of a relativized (dyadic) truth predicate, while acknowledging that the truth predicate used in ordinary talk is a monadic predicate for which the Equivalence Schema holds (cf.

If they set it narrowly— to an individual or idiosyncratic taste—they can meet Assertion conditions and Expression of attitude but have trouble with Disagreement and Retraction conditions. If they set it broadly—to a group or shared taste—they can do better with Disagreement and Retraction conditions, but they fail to meet Assertion conditions or Expression of attitude. It is natural to think at this point that our menu of options is incomplete. In considering the options for contextualism, we have been tacitly assuming that a particular occurrence of “tasty,” used in a particular context, has its extension absolutely.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.61 of 5 – based on 5 votes